Aggregated UK political opinion content, stakeholder research and policy consultations.
Andrew Gwynne\'s blog

Déjà vu, both Home and Away

June 24th, 2010 by Andrew Gwynne

It’s certainly been an interesting week in politics.

Of course the ‘highlight’ of the week in Parliament – apart from my Westminster Hall debate on policing cuts in Greater Manchester, that is – has been the new Coalition government’s emergency budget.

Much has already been written about the budget, and as the measures begin to bite, no doubt much more will be written; but I can’t help but feel a real sense of déjà vu. Geoffrey Howe’s ‘tough’ budget of 1981 saw attacks on housing benefit, child benefit and of course a near doubling of VAT to 15%.  That budget, of course, precipitated a deep recession from which parts of the country, especially those over-dependent on traditional industries – including my own Denton and Reddish constituency – have struggled to recover from.

Today, almost 30 years on, there are similar fears that the measures in the Coalition’s emergency budget could stall the fragile recovery and see us spiral down into a double-dip recession. It’s pointless re-running the arguments put at the election (when of course, Nick agreed with Gordon!). The Coalition have changed Britain’s economic policy considerably. Is it a gamble that will pay off for them? Only time will tell, but this country, and the public sector in particular, is certainly in for a bumpy ride in the years ahead.

Congratulations today to the Hon. Julia Gillard MP, who in a bloodless coup (almost!) has succeeded Kevin Rudd as Labor Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Very sensibly – and no doubt learning some key lessons from what happened to its British sister party – Gillard has publicly acknowledged on TV that she is an ‘unelected’ Prime Minister and that she will set in motion arrangements for an early general election so that Australians can endorse (or sack) her.

So it’s going to be worth paying a wee bit more attention to politics in the southern hemisphere for a while.  Things are moving quickly down under; Rudd of course was the most popular leader and PM ever just a few months ago. But then things went horrendously wrong for him over a number of policy issues, not least his mining tax proposals.  Can Gillard claw back enough support for the ALP in the next few weeks? We’ll see.

Australian politics is a tough game. One thing is for sure, the next election there is going to be well worth any political junkie taking the time to watch!!

A final interesting thought – with Gillard’s appointment, Australia has scored an all-women hat-trick: A female Prime Minister; a female Governor-General and, of course not wishing to stir up the Monarchy debate, a female Head of State!

Our push-me-pull-you Government

June 1st, 2010 by Andrew Gwynne

If a week is a long time in politics, then a full five year parliament is an eternity.

In the immediate aftermath of the 2010 General Election, commentators speculated that the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition government wouldn’t last; that this marriage of convenience would crumble under the pressure of tough decisions in office.

Now I never subscribed to that scenario, although it is still very possible. The Coalition is undoubtedly fragile and there are two competing agendas with people in both parties (let alone the Labour opposition) who want the whole project to collapse in failure. It reminds me of Dr Doolitle’s push-me-pull-you.

For the Lib Dems, the challenge is to remain a distinctive and relevant political entity. The risk is they become seen as one with the Conservatives, and particularly so with every unpopular decision made. Is it possible, over a five year term, to maintain a degree of independence whilst equally maintaining effective collective cabinet government?

The Lib Dems like to portray themselves as the ‘nice guys’ in British politics. When they have to start making very unpopular decisions in government, how will they cope? Presumably this is where Simon Hughes’s ludicrous suggestion at still having Lib Dem ‘shadows’ despite being in government (as well as to snaffle some opposition Short money) comes from.

But the fragility of the Coaltion should be a worry for Labour too, because it breeds complacency. There were quite senior people back in the early 1990s, following the party’s fourth consecutive defeat at the polls, who wanted to halt the whole process of ‘modernisation’. Their theory was that Labour needed just one more heave to propel it to power, irrespective of the policy platform which had been resoundly rejected by the electorate.

Thankfully, Tony Blair accelerated the process of modernisation, setting the foundation for Labour to govern for thirteen years. As then, Labour should not now put off making the changes it needs to make to win back the support it lost in 2010. To sit back and hope for the Coalition to implode would be disastrous for Labour. The party needs not just to be a credible opposition to the Coalition, but a real alternative government to it.

Of course, there is just a possibility, too, that in five years time the Coalition- having held it together and directed Britain through the economic morass – will have re-found political popularity. If that happens then people may start to believe that a more consensual style of politics, transcending the traditional left-right splits, has worked and that Britain, perhaps with a new electoral system, will have genuinely entered into a new era.

We shall see!